trivial line bundle造句
例句與造句
- Since the trivial line bundle over has first Stiefel Whitney class 0, it is not isomorphic to.
- If the dimension is lower than 3, one first takes a Whitney sum with a trivial line bundle.
- Similarly to the case of spin structures, one takes a Whitney sum with a trivial line bundle if the manifold is odd-dimensional.
- If is the trivial line bundle \ underline { \ mathbf { C } }, then this sheaf coincides with the structure sheaf \ mathcal O _ X of the complex manifold.
- The case of a trivial line bundle was considered in earlier work by Phillip Griffiths in connection to variations of Hodge structures and by Fujita, Kawamata and Eckart Viehweg in algebraic geometry.
- It's difficult to find trivial line bundle in a sentence. 用trivial line bundle造句挺難的
- In general, essentially the same argument applies using a more general version of the Clifford inequality for local complete intersections with a dualising line bundle and 1-dimensional sections in the trivial line bundle.
- More abstractly, rather than stabilizing the embedding, one can take any embedding, and then take a vector bundle direct sum with a sufficient number of trivial line bundles; this corresponds exactly to the normal bundle of the stabilized embedding.
- But this flat connection is not isomorphic to the obvious flat connection on the trivial line bundle over " A " 1 ( as an algebraic vector bundle with flat connection ), because its solutions do not have moderate growth at ".
- For instance, the tangent bundle of spheres is stably trivial but not trivial ( the usual inclusion of the sphere "'S " "'n " ?" "'R " "'n " + 1 has trivial normal bundle, thus the tangent bundle of the sphere plus a trivial line bundle is the tangent bundle of Euclidean space, restricted to "'S " "'n ", which is trivial ), thus other characteristic classes all vanish for the sphere, but the Euler class does not vanish for even spheres, providing a non-trivial invariant.